Urban Myths about Ecology and Development | |||
MYTH | FACT | ||
1 |
Environmental protection and land development are incompatible. |
Careful land development can enhance environmental resources and reduce pressure on more sensitive resources elsewhere. | |
2 |
Environmentally sensitive development adds little to market value. |
Green projects often achieve premium prices and fast absorption rates. | |
3 |
Zoning regulations protect the environment. |
Land use regulations often discourage development practices that protect the environment. | |
4 |
Compact development causes more environmental harm than low-density development. |
Compact development can direct growth away from environmentally sensitive areas. | |
5 |
Concentrated development means more traffic congestion. |
In dense developments, people drive less, walk more, and use mass transit more. | |
6 |
Large-lot residential development preserves open space and reduces infrastructure costs. |
Suburban large-lot development often is both ecologically and financially inefficient. | |
7 |
Green building practices are too costly to become mainstream. |
The economic competitiveness of green features is on a steep upward curve -- with both market share and demand on the rise. | |
8 |
Developers and environmentalists are always in conflict. |
The growth-versus-environment debate is not an either-or proposition. | |
Urban Land, Jul 2002, p 54, by David J. O'Neill and Victoria R. Wilbur. |
for more information, email the Caspar webster,
webster@casparcommons.org
: : posted 12 August 2002 : 9:40 Caspar (Pacific) time : :
Reprinted by permission; all rights reserved by copyright holder as noted above
|